State v. Chandler’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited
38 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 46 Wash. App. 882 - State v. Day · 143 Wash. 2d 485 - State v. Chandler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[t]he court on its own motion may continue the case when required in the due administration of justice and the alleged juvenile offender will not be substantially prejudiced in the presentation of his or her defense.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hoffman“JuCR 7.8(e)(3) has no application here because it only authorizes a trial court to continue the case after it has been set within the time frame set forth in JuCR 7.8(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hoffman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.