Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 P.3d 419 - People v. Raglin

People v. Raglin’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Stone v. People · Johnson v. State · People v. Collins · People v. Raffaelli

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Photographs of a homicide victim are admissible at trial when they depict the appearance of the victim, the location and nature of the wounds, or other facts that would be competent for a witness to describe in words.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) they should attempt to reach a unanimous verdict; (2) each juror should decide the ease for himself or herself after impartial consideration with the others; (3) they should not hesitate to re-examine their views and change their opinions if convinced they are incorrect; and (4) they should not surrender their honest convictions solely because of the opinions of other jurors or for the purpose of returning a verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “I would ask you at this time to please go back to the jury room and resume your deliberations. If after you have tried that you believe that you're unable to reach a unanimous verdict, you can let us know when you have decided that, and we'll go from there.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.