Brown v. Lange’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Guin v. Ha · Kelly v. Zamarello · New York Life Insurance v. Brown · Smith v. Johnston · Ford v. Municipality of Anchorage
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b)(1) Failure to Appear. If the defendant has been defaulted for failure to appear and the plaintiff's claim(s) is for a sum certain or for a sum that can by computation be made certain, upon the filing of an application for default judgment ... the clerk shall enter default judgment for the amount due. ... (c)(1) In all other cases the party entitled to a default judgment shall apply to the court therefor. . . . If the party against whom default judgment is sought has appeared in the action, that party ... shall be served with written notice of the application for judgment. . . . If, in order to enable the court to enter judgment or to carry it into effect, it is necessary to take an account or to determine the amount of damages or to establish the truth of any averment by evidence or to make an investigation of any other matter, the court may conduct such hearings or order such references as it deems necessary and proper. (c)(3) If the amount of damages claimed in an application to the court for default judgment is unliquidated, the applicant may submit evidence by affidavit showing the amount of damages and if, under the provisions of paragraph (1) of this subdivision, notice of the application is necessary, the parties against whom judgment is sought may submit affidavits in opposition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When a lawyer knows the identity of a lawyer representing an opposing party, the lawyer should not take advantage of the opposing lawyer by causing any default or dismissal to be entered without first inquiring about the opposing lawyer's intention to proceed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Although no Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are worded exactly the same as Alaska Civil Rules 55(a)(1) or 55(c)(1), the similarities between the federal and the Alaska schemes make it appropriate for us to look to the federal case law for guidance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.