Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 PACOMMW 89 - Commonwealth v. Kauffman

Commonwealth v. Kauffman’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1991

8 state decisions

50197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hibbs v. Arensberg · Smith v. Darby School District · Tassone v. Redstone Township School District · Lucostic v. Brownsville Area School District · Lakeland Joint School District v. Gilvary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The salary of any district superintendent, assistant district superintendent or other profes sional employe in any school district may be increased at any time during the term for which such person is employed, whenever the board of school directors of the district deems it necessary or advisable to do so, but there shall be no demotion of any professional employe either in salary or in type of position, except as otherwise provided in this act, ivithout the consent of the employe, or, if such consent is not received, then such demotion shall be subject to the right to a hearing before the board of school directors and an appeal in the same manner as hereinbefore provided in the case of the dismissal of a professional employe. 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.