Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 R.I. 104 - Taylor v. Slater

Taylor v. Slater’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
10
states following
September 1978
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 1978 · most notably Leathers v. Stewart (1911), Grange Nat. Bk. v. First Nat. Bk. (1938)

3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions — followed in 10 states

110189819001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Galliher v. Cadwell · Speidel v. Henrici · Lane & Bodley Co. v. Locke · O'Reilly v. New York & New England Railroad · Reynolds v. Hennessy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “gives to a complainant the right to state a new and proper case, if he can, but it takes away no right of defense to such suit on any ground other than that of the judgment as a bar.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.