<p>Before Wallace, J., Orangeburg, May, 1883.</p> <p>The opinion states the case.</p> <p>1 Chit. Gont., 538 (11th Am. edit.); 1 Pars. Qont., 537; Benj. Sales, § 320; 14 S. 0., 522; 1 Bay, 312; 4 Mass., 269; 4 Wash. O. 0., 79, 588; 20 S. 0., 17.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1884-04-26
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1934
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1I concur in this opinion on the ground that the paper in question must be regarded as a Avriting in the nature of a mortgage of personal property, and therefore covered by the second section of the act of 1843, incorporated into the general statutes.