Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 So. 3d 1032 - Hunter v. Hunter

21 So. 3d 1032 - Hunter v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 348 So. 2d 75 - Pearce v. Pearce · 352 So. 2d 1013 - Halcomb v. Halcomb · 648 So. 2d 359 - Allen v. Allen · 870 So. 2d 626 - Roan v. Roan · Vallaire v. Vallaire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The policy reason behind this rule is obvious: the law does not want to encourage those owing alimony or child support to become involved in “self-help” by making their own determinations as to when they have satisfied their alimony or child support obligations by some method other than payment in accordance with the court order-.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.