Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 So. 3d 140

S.D.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 6, 2009

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-11-06

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2010

2 state decisions

Relies on D.A. v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-11-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this appeal from a juvenile disposition, the State concedes that the trial court erred by assessing costs of prosecution. See D.A. v. State, 11 So.3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes, does not authorize courts to impose costs of prosecution on a juvenile adjudicated delinquent). Accordingly, we remand with directions that these costs be stricken. In all other respects, the adjudications of delinquency and disposition are affirmed.

¶2AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

MONACO, C.J., LAWSON and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
/21/so3d/140 · .json · Public domain