Price v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
30 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Authority · 926 So. 2d 167 - MS Credit Center, Inc. v. Horton · 869 So. 2d 397 - Davis v. Hoss · 912 So. 2d 134 - Monsanto Co. v. Hall · 733 So. 2d 199 - Barnes v. Singing River Hosp. Systems
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, ..or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading,, the. amendment relates back to the date of the original pleading. An amendment changing the party against whom a claim is asserted relates back if the foregoing provision is satisfied and, within the period provided by Rule 4(h) for service of the -summons and complaint, the party to be brought in by amendment: (1) has received such notice of the institution of the action that tlie party will not be prejudiced in maintaining the party’s defense on the merits, and (2) knew or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning the identity of the proper party, the action would have been brought against the party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he ninety-day notice requirement ... is a hard-edged, mandatory rule which the [Supreme] Court strictly enforces.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[s]trict compliance with statutory notice is required ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.