Hoskins v. Hoskins’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 637 So. 2d 850 - Chamblee v. Chamblee · Anderson v. Anderson · Griffin v. Griffin · 618 So. 2d 108 - Gardner v. Gardner · Shavers v. Shavers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) “endangers life, limb, or health, or creates a reasonable apprehension of such danger, rendering the relationship unsafe for the party seeking relief’[;] or (2) “is so unnatural and infamous” as to make the marriage revolting to the non-offending spouse and render it impossible for that spouse to discharge the duties of marriage, thus destroying the basis for its continuance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he complaining spouse's testimony alone is inadequate to establish habitual cruel and inhuman treatment to obtain a divorce.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“would reasonably render the continuance of the marital relation, unendurable or dangerous to life, health or safety.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.