21 So. 3d 745 - Burgess v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"1. Copy of [Burgess's] brief on appeal of his original conviction specifically including all issues raised on appeal; "2. Statement(s) setting forth with specificity the factual basis of [Burgess's] allegations that several jurors failed to fully respond to voir dire questions; and "3. Statement(s) setting forth with specificity when and how [Burgess] *Page 749 and/or his counsel discovered the basis of [Burgess's] allegations that several jurors failed to fully respond to voir dire questions."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.