Mathers v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 839 So. 2d 867 - Ondrejack v. Ondrejack · 841 So. 2d 669 - Kovalchick v. Kovalchick · Morris v. Morris · Catalfumo v. Catalfumo · O'Neill v. O'Neill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is not to penalize the losing party, but rather to compensate the successful claimant for losing the use of the money between the date he or she was entitled to it and the date of judgment. A corollary purpose is to prevent the judgment debtor from being unjustly enriched by the use of that money.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sullivan v. Sullivan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.