Dunlap v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Buenoano v. State · 193 So. 2d 460 - Gibbs v. State · 675 So. 2d 652 - Northard v. State · Paul v. State · 754 So. 2d 141 - Lubin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court’s decision as to whether to grant a motion for mistrial is reviewed for abuse of discretion. The power to declare a mistrial should be exercised with care and caution and only in cases of absolute necessity. [A] mistrial should only be declared if the error is so prejudicial and fundamental that it denies the accused a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lucas v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.