Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 SW3D 277 - Enriquez v. State

Enriquez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schlossberg v. Maryland Comptroller of the Treasury · Koskela v. King County · Skinner v. State · Ramos v. State · Gabriel v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n determining whether the second prong has been met, it is not enough that the jury may disbelieve crucial evidence pertaining to the greater offense, but rather, there must be some evidence directly germane to the lesser-included offense for the finder of fact to consider before an instruction on a lesser-included offense is warranted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “pluck[ ] certain evidence from the record and examin[e] it in a vacuum.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.