Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 S.W.3d 337 - Sanford v. State

Sanford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 358th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Kotteakos v. United States · Fisher v. United States · O'NEAL v. McAninch · United States v. Lane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because Rule 44.2(a) requires reversal unless harmlessness is shown, it effectively places the burden on the State to show that the error is harmless.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.