Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 TC 191 - Auerbach Shoe Co. v. Commissioner

Auerbach Shoe Co. v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
February 2011
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently February 2011 · most notably DiLeo v. Commissioner (1991), Hicks Co. v. Commissioner (1971)

5 federal appellate ·

2301953196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spies v. United States · Burnet v. Harmel · Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co. · Joyce v. Gentsch · Currier v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he unforeseen circumstance that a carry-back later arises to offset the deficiency should not operate to relieve the taxpayer of the addition imposed for the fraud.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In order to bind the Government and to preclude it from asserting a further liability it is necessary for the petitioner here to show that it entered into a compromise or closing agreement with the respondent in the manner provided by the [1939] Internal Revenue Code ( secs. 3760 and 3761 ). Joyce v. Gentsch , 141 F. 2d 891 (C.A. 6, 1944). See Payson v. Commissioner , 166 F. 2d 1008 (C.A. 2, 1948), and Bank of New York v. United States , 170 F. 2d 20 (C.A. 3, 1948).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.