Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 U.S. 699 - Gracie v. Palmer

Gracie v. Palmer’s Empirical Analysis

21 U.S. 699 · 1823

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 6 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably United States v. Mayer (1914), Ex Parte Shaw (1892)

8 federal appellate · 6 district · 11 state decisions

200182318301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hugh v. Higgs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That the uniform construction, under the clause of the act referred to,, had been that it was not necessary to aver on the record that the defendant was an inhabitant of the district, or found therein. That it was sufficient if the court appeared to have jurisdiction by the citizenship or alienage of the parties. The exemption from ax-rest in a district in which the defendant was not an inhabitant, or in which he was not found, at the time of serving the process, was the privilege of the defendant, which he might waive by a voluntary appearance. That if process was returned by the marshal, as, served upon him within the district, it was sufficient, and that where the defendant voluntarily appeared in the court below, without taking the exception, it was an admission of tho service, and a waiver of any further inquiry into the matter.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.