21 Utah 2d 342 - Hampton v. State Ex Rel. Road Commission’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2011
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brock v. State Highway Commission · 66 Wash. 2d 378 - Deaconess Hospital v. Washington State Highway Commission · Iowa State Highway Commission v. Smith · 10 Utah 2d 100 - Springville Banking Co. v. Burton · State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Meier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““does not include the right to travel in any particular direction from one’s property or upon any particular part of the public highway right-of-way_Nor does the right of ingress or egress to or from one’s property include any right in and to existing public traffic on the highway, or any right to have such traffic pass by one’s abutting property.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The right of access to the highway however, is in the nature of a special easement, which exists as a right of ownership of abutting land, and is a substantial property right which may not be taken away or impaired without just compensation, and is subject only to a reasonable regulation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reasonable access under the existing facts and circumstances.” Id. at 711. We do not believe the Court meant "free and convenient access”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.