State v. Maestes

¶1M appeals from a jury verdict and judgment of conviction for stealing a stereo. Affirmed.

¶2Pie says 1) he was not afforded the interdictions of Miranda v. State of Arizona,1 which appears not so; 2) that there was insufficient evidence to convict, which the record reflects is not so; 3) that it was error for the police officer not to disclose his informant, — no one asking him to and this point being raised for the first time on appeal, and not being a point on appeal in any event; and 4) that a refused requested instruction constituted error, which is not so.