Adamson v. Adamson’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1993
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Bell · 99 Ohio App. 428 - Beach v. Beach · Openshaw v. Openshaw · 18 Utah 2d 55 - Albrechtsen v. Albrechtsen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The attorney is not a party to the proceeding and by himself has no right to carry it on_ The attorney’s entitlement to fees is derived through and is enforceable through his client. The trial court acted correctly in granting the motion to quash the garnishment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McDonald v. McDonald
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.