¶1The court is of opinion that the limitation in the will of Unity Hooper is good; and that the decree of dissolution is therefore erroneous. The decree is reversed with costs; and the cause remanded for farther proceedings, according to the principles here stated.
¶2See Higgenbotham v. Rucker, 2 Call, 316. Royall v. Eppes, 2 Munf. 491. Dunn v. Bray, 1 Call, 344 Timberlake v. Graves, 6 Munf. 174. Gresham Gresbam. 6 Munf 187.