Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Va. App. 141 - Henry v. Commonwealth

21 Va. App. 141 - Henry v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 8 Va. App. 400 - Kauffmann v. Commonwealth · Blythe v. Commonwealth · Jones v. Commonwealth · 12 Va. App. 65 - Stein v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under Blockburger , “the applicable rule is that, where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.... The test of whether there are separate acts sustaining several offenses ‘is whether the same evidence is required to sustain them’.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.