Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Va. App. 156 - Commonwealth v. Spencer

21 Va. App. 156 - Commonwealth v. Spencer’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Prouse · United States v. Sokolow · 12 Va. App. 1066 - Commonwealth v. Grimstead · Zimmerman v. Commonwealth · 19 Va. App. 437 - Logan v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he... officers knew that other cities and counties in the state do not require decals. Until the officers confirmed where the vehicle was registered, no specific and objective facts indicated that appellee’s vehicle was violating a local ordinance requiring a city or county decal. Although the City of Richmond requires decals and the car was being driven in Richmond, the lack of a city or county decal, without more, was insufficient to justify this stop of the vehicle.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “benefit gained from stopping individual vehicles without decals is marginal when compared to the constitutional rights of drivers and their passengers who are seized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.