Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Va. App. 161 - Graves v. Commonwealth

21 Va. App. 161 - Graves v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2016

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

100199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. White · Mason v. Commonwealth · Johnson v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Jones · Jones v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the [robbery] indictment against Graves did not set forth allegations of value or of theft from the person, it did not charge grand larceny from the person. Therefore, grand larceny from the person was not a lesser offense included within the robbery specification of the indictment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “At common law property was stolen “from the person” of another even if it was only “in the presence” of the person at the time it was stolen.... “Property is stolen ‘from the person’ if it was under the protection of the person ... although not actually ‘attached’ to him.... As said by Coke in the 1600’s: ‘for that which is taken in his presence, is in law taken from his person.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “A lesser included offense is necessarily charged by implication in an indictment for a greater offense and necessarily proven by the proof of the greater offense____A crime that is not a necessarily lesser included offense, on the other hand, is not charged by implication and is not necessarily proved by proof of the greater offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.