Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Va. App. 179 - Winn v. Commonwealth

21 Va. App. 179 - Winn v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2025

15 state decisions

901995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Williams · Mason v. Commonwealth · Raiford v. State · 202 Ill. App. 3d 164 - People v. Brooks · State v. Sein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The touching or violation necessary to prove [robbery] may be indirect, but cannot result merely from the force associated with the taking.” Instead, “[violence or force requires a physical touching or violation of the victim’s person.” ... “ ‘[T]he offense of robbery ... is not related to the force used on the object taken but to the force or intimidation directed at the person of the victim.’ ” $ H* H* H* [T]here must be “additional circumstances at the time of the snatching tending to transform the taking from a larceny to a robbery.” For example, these circumstances are present when a struggle ensues, where the -victim is knocked down, or where the victim is put in fear — in other words, where the defendant employs violence or intimidation against the victim’s person.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.