Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Va. App. 222 - Jenkins v. Commonwealth

21 Va. App. 222 - Jenkins v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. United States · McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco · Prejean v. Blackburn · Webb v. Commonwealth · Cartera v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “exception is a difficult rule to apply in the context of real cases. It has always caused controversy, and presumably will always do so, because it is often arguable whether the declaration is being offered to prove the truth of the content of the declaration or not, and lawyers and judges may quite reasonably reach different conclusions on this question in any given case.... Part of the difficulty in”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Id. at 518 , 248 S.E.2d at 786. The testimony that the trial judge admitted in this case is analogous to the testimony the Supreme Court barred in Cartera . The psychologist's testimony that the child told him he had been”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reaction to an identifiable psychological stressor (or multiple stressors).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.