Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Va. App. 593 - Bunn v. Commonwealth

21 Va. App. 593 - Bunn v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2015

24 state decisions

160199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Sandstrom v. Montana · Collins v. Youngblood · Barnes v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he obvious purpose of Code § 19.2-295.1 is to allow the jury, which will be recommending sentence, to consider the defendant’s ... current record of criminal convictions. Nothing in the language or logic of the statute suggests that the legislature intended to limit the jury’s consideration to anything other than the defendant’s complete criminal record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.