Stubblebine v. Stubblebine’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 601 So. 2d 534 - Pimm v. Pimm · Antonelli v. Antonelli · Jacobs v. Jacobs · 16 Va. App. 647 - Brody v. Brody · 5 Va. App. 359 - Payne v. Payne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“husband contrary to his assertion, is not retired____ Clearly, husband chooses to work but not earn income which could help support his wife, who cannot work. Husband’s needs, as shown by the evidence, are minimal. He can and should pay spousal support. The evidence supports a minimum imputed income to the husband of $40,000. Wife is entitled to a spousal support award of $1,000 per month. Husband should provide health insurance for the wife substantially similar to what is now provided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.