¶1We are unable to distinguish this case from the case of State ex rel. Hartman v. Superior Court of Thurston County, decided October 3, 1899 (ante, p. 469). It mates no difference in principle that the party *629seeking the writ of assistance in this ease was a receiver. A receiver cannot litigate the independent rights, of individuals under other or different provisions of the law from those invoked by any other citizen.
¶2The writ will issue as prayed for.