21 Wash. App. 405 - State v. Humphries’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably 105 Wash. 2d 120 - State v. Hornaday (1986), State v. Tamalini (1998)
4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002)
Relies on 88 Wash. 2d 221 - State v. Wanrow · 73 Wash. 2d 533 - State v. Dana · 11 Wash. App. 583 - State v. Crudup · United States v. Frizzi · 47 Wash. 2d 102 - State v. Lyskoski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Every person who, under circumstances not amounting to assault in either the first or second degree, shall be guilty of assault in the third degree when he: (a) With intent to prevent or resist the execution of any lawful process or mandate of any court officer or the lawful apprehension or detention of himself or another person shall assault another; . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] person illegally arrested by an officer may resist that arrest; the force used in resisting an unlawful arrest must be reasonable and proportioned to the injury attempted on the party sought to be arrested.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Valentine“reasonably clear and . . . not misleading to people of ordinary intelligence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. MacReady
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.