Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Wash. App. 44 - State v. Ogden

21 Wash. App. 44 - State v. Ogden’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2007

20 state decisions

1401978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leary v. United States · 86 Wash. 2d 607 - Haslund v. City of Seattle · 78 Wash. 2d 121 - State v. Golladay · 81 Wash. 2d 448 - Siegler v. Kuhlman · 77 Wash. 2d 616 - Maynard Inv. Co., Inc. v. McCann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any prosecution for burglary, any person who enters or remains unlawfully in a building may be inferred to have acted with intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein, unless such entering or remaining shall be explained by evidence satisfactory to the trier of fact to have been made without such criminal intent.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “RCW 9A.52.040 authorizes an inference of intent only if a person "enters or remains unlawfully in a building ..." The instruction as drafted enabled the jury to draw the inference from an attempted entry. The statute does not authorize such an instruction, and therefore comprises error of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The [speedy trial] rule is a directive from the Supreme Court to the superior court that a confined defendant be released by the judicial branch or be tried within 60 days. The rule makes no pretense of directing procedures in the executive or legislative branches.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.