21 Wash. App. 762 - Bakke v. Buck’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2002
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 75 Wash. 2d 660 - Ruth v. Dight · 22 Wash. 2d 378 - Hafer v. Spaeth · 67 Wash. 2d 268 - Baske v. Russell · 56 Wash. 2d 465 - Ennis v. Ring · 69 Wash. 2d 682 - Peoples National Bank of Washington v. National Bank of Commerce of Seattle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a greater rate of interest than is allowed by statute shall be contracted for or received or reserved, the contract shall be usurious, but shall not, therefore, be void. If in any action on such contract proof be made that greater rate of interest has been directly or indirectly contracted for or taken or reserved, the creditor shall only be entitled to the principal, less the amount of interest accruing thereon at the rate contracted for . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hansen v. Doerflein“the debtor shall be entitled to costs and reasonable attorneys' fees plus the amount by which the amount he has paid under the contract exceeds the amount to which the creditor is entitled . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the principal less twice the amount of the interest paid, and less the amount of all accrued and unpaid interest”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.