21 Wash. App. 84 - Loveland v. Leslie’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 81 Wash. 2d 259 - State v. Reader's Digest Ass'n · 81 Wash. 2d 292 - Fleming v. City of Tacoma · 87 Wash. 2d 802 - Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, & Pacific Railroad v. Washington State Human Rights Commission · 84 Wash. 2d 874 - Blondheim v. State · 87 Wash. 2d 348 - Swift v. Island County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Persons of normal intelligence commonly relate the term "marital status" to the existence or absence of a marriage bond. We hold the statute "provides fair notice" that discrimination based solely on the absence or existence of a marital relationship is prohibited. It is not unconstitutionally vague.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“presiding in a contested case or preparing a decision, or proposal for decision ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.