Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 WYO 513 - Blonde v. Merriam

Blonde v. Merriam’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1930
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. Maddux · McIntosh v. Zaring · King v. Gilson · Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Holland · Fox v. Meacham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The application for a, new trial must be made at the term the verdict, report or decision is rendered; and except for the cause of newly discovered evidence, material for the party applying, which he could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced at the trial, shall be made within ten days after the verdict or decision is rendered, unless such party is unavoidably prevented from filing the same within such time. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The application must be by motion, upon written grounds, filed at the time of making the motion. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.