Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 A.2d 306 - Asche v. Asche

Asche v. Asche’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1971
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hannah Fitchie v. Cecil Brown O · 24 Del. Ch. 300 - Cann v. Van Sant · Stellings v. Autry · Equitable Trust Co. v. Ward · Girard Trust Co. v. Rector of St. Anne's Protestant Episcopal Church

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In approaching the problem, we have in mind certain basic principles applicable to all will construction cases. We must try to determine the Testator’s intent from the language of the will as a whole. If the intent so found creates a gift which violates the rule against perpetuities, the gift must fail. The Court will, however, prefer that construction which does not offend the rule, if such a construction is reasonably justified by the language used. The Court will also prefer construction that the gift is vested rather than contingent.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.