Borger v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2000
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co. v. Warner · Watford v. Morse · Harris v. Snider · Evening Star Newspaper Company v. Gray · 103 So. 2d 553 - Mire v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“properly submitted to jury on expert medical testimony that preexisting 'quiescent' condition was ‘very much aggravated by, and very much worsened by, the accident.’ ”). Further, although in suggesting the complexity of the causal inquiry (and hence the need for expert testimony) we quoted a five-part test set forth in a textbook on damages, we did not imply that the expert’s opinion must conform to this test in every case. See id. at 1151 n. 3 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McLeish v. Beachy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.