Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 Ala. 465 - Sims v. Sims

Sims v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1971
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1971

5 state decisions

10192319301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Owen v. Slatter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But this statute applies to acts required to be done within a certain time, and not to time which must intervene before certain things can be done or before certain rights are barred, such as the foregoing quoted provision or the statute of limitations. “ ‘Whatever may be the English doctrine upon the subject, it is the practice of our court to include one day and exclude the other, except when the statute requires so many entire days to intervene — in which case both are excluded.’ Owen v. Slatter, 26 Ala. 547 , 62 Am. Dec. 745 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.