Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 Ariz. 534 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · Ring v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The state correctly notes that McMullen waived his right to a jury trial in the plea agreement and that he did so orally at the change-of-plea hearing. But that right related only to the guilt phase on the substantive offense. Before a defendant may be deemed to have waived a constitutional right such as the right to a jury trial, it must be clear that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently relinquished that right. Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 243 n. 5, 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 1712 n. 5, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 , 280 n. 5 (1969); see also Ariz. R.Crim. P. 17.1(b), 18.1, 16A and 17 A.R.S. (setting forth criteria for pleading guilty and waiving right to jury trial); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461, 1466 (1938) (defendant’s waiver of constitutional rights may only be based on intentional relinquishment of known right).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]here was no mention in the agreement of the right to a jury trial on sentencing factors”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.