Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 Ark. 608 - Beasley v. Boren

Beasley v. Boren’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Sumlin v. Woodson (1947), Lutterloh v. Patterson (1947)

25 state decisions

8019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bluthenthal v. Atkinson · Kozy Theatre Co. v. Love · Edgar Lumber Co. v. Cornie Stave Co. · Prince v. Alford · Webster v. Telle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At the threshold of a consideration of the rights of the parties to this litigation, it must be recognized that appellees, who purchased the property while appellant was in possession, were bound by the provisions of any valid agreement as to lease which appellant had with appellees’ vendor. * * * “The provision in the lease for its renewal was indefinite because it failed to fix the rental to be paid during the additional térm. But, because a contract is uncertain in its terms, it does not necessarily follow that it is a nullity. The parties to a contract may, by their mutual actions in carrying it out, furnish an index to its meaning, which the language thereof fails to do. After all, the written instrument is but an evidence of what the signers thereof propose to bind themselves to do, and when, by their conduct in carrying out the agreement, both of the parties to the. contract demonstrate an .intention to heal an uncertainty in the contract, the courts will generally adopt this practical construction.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.