In Re Ward’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2017
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Citizens Bank of Md. v. Strumpf · Daugherty v. Central Trust Co. · Cheeseman v. Nachman · In Re Conti · National Bank & Trust Company v. Castle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“simply unwilling to pay the exemption amount over to the debtors when they owe[d] him [the trustee] a greater amount,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Latman v. Burdette“not seeking to deny the debtors their exemption,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Latman v. Burdette
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.