210 Cal. App. 2d 26 - McDaniel v. Dowell’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably 45 Cal. App. 4th 1628 - Staten v. Superior Court (1996), 218 Cal. App. 3d 111 - Danieley v. Goldmine Ski Associates, Inc. (1990)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · 52 Cal. 2d 154 - Rodriguez v. Barnett · 22 Cal. 2d 111 - Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry. · 99 Cal. App. 2d 484 - Brown v. San Francisco Ball Club, Inc. · Curcic v. Nelson Display Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here is no other basis for the imposition upon the defendant [ ] of a duty to exercise the utmost care and diligence for the safety of the plaintiff.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.