Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 CONN 132 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
5
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 91 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably State v. Whipper (2001), State v. Tweedy (1991)

5 federal appellate · 91 state decisions

5601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · Holland v. United States · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton · State v. Evans · Connecticut v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the word “consent” is commonly regarded as referring to the state of mind of the complainant in a sexual assault case, it cannot be viewed as a wholly subjective concept. Although the actual state of mind of the actor in a criminal case may in many instances be the issue upon which culpability depends, a defendant is not chargeable with knowledge of the internal workings of the minds of others except to the extent that he should reasonably have gained such knowledge from his observations of their conduct.... [W]hether a complainant has consented to intercourse depends upon her manifestations of such consent as reasonably construed. If the conduct of the complainant under all the circumstances should reasonably be viewed as indicating consent to the act of intercourse, a defendant should not be found guilty because of some undisclosed mental reservation on the part of the complainant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a penal statute must be sufficiently definite to enable a person to know what conduct he must avoid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.