Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 F.1d 1 - Thrush v. Fullhart

Thrush v. Fullhart’s Empirical Analysis

210 F. 1 · 1913

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2000

4 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

901913192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The United States v. Gotlieb Breitling · J. W. Bishop Co. v. Dodson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Without stating the various propositions submitted, or discussing the questions they severally present, it is sufficient to say that, in our judgment, none of these instructions involve substantial error. Even if they be regarded as favoring the plaintiff’s contention, we are not persuaded, in view qf the pleadings and evidence, that they were incorrect or unwarranted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.