Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 F.1d 262 - The Lackawanna

The Lackawanna’s Empirical Analysis

210 F. 262 · 1913

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
April 2002
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2002 · most notably Boudoin v. J. Ray McDermott & Co. (1960), Rice v. Brooklyn Ash Removal Co. (1918)

17 federal appellate · 7 district ·

1201913192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Lackawanna

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are not told whether the rudder was loose or what caused the steering gear to break down. It may have been the result of a defect in the steering engine or of the steersman's negligent handling of the wheel. These are among the possible causes which are not eliminated. * * * In this condition of the proof we do not think it can be found that all possible causes have been enumerated and satisfactorily accounted for.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The defense of inevitable accident has, in some cases, been held to be established even when the real cause is not definitely ascertained. In all such cases, however, all possible causes have been exhaustively covered, and it has been shown, as to each and all of them, that the proper exercise of reasonable care by owner, master, officers, and crew would not have avoided them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.