Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 F.1d 878 - In re Abramson

In re Abramson’s Empirical Analysis

210 F. 878 · 1914

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2012

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

5019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[J]udgments for penalties are not debts which can be proved or allowed as such because they are not for a fixed liability”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.