United States v. Klock’s Empirical Analysis
210 F.2d 217 · 1954
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2004 · most notably Shotwell Manufacturing Company v. United States (1963), United States v. Cauble (1983)
40 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1005 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 656
Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · Nye & Nissen v. United States · Heike v. United States · Mulloney v. United States · Gomila v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * In effect, the defense to the substantive counts of misapplication of funds was that the bank officials treated the overdrafts as loans. While perhaps making of loans in this manner may be in violation of some state law, nevertheless it does not constitute a crime under 12 U.S.C.A. § 592 or 18 U.S.C. § 656 , if Klock had no notice of the impropriety. * * * ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“not hold that the charge amounted to error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Larrea v. Bennett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.