Masse v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
210 F.2d 418 · 1954
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 2006 · most notably State v. Whittemore (1961), State v. Jenerett (1972)
38 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2421 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act))
Relies on Caminetti v. United States · Cleveland v. United States · Affronti v. United States · Mellor v. United States · Dunn v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We think it equally clear on this record that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction of Masse. The evidence of defendant’s unlawful cohabitation with the girl in Illinois, their similar intimacy at Lake City, coupled with the evidence of their adultery at Panama City, adequately supports the conclusion that from the beginning at least one of the purposes was illicit intercourse. The White Slave Traffic Act does not require that the interstate transportation need be solely for immoral purposes, if such purpose constitutes one of the reasons for the transportation. Dunn v. United States, 10 Cir., 190 F.2d 496 ; Daigle v. United States, 1 Cir., 181 F.2d 311 ; Mellor v. United States, 8 Cir., 160 F.2d 757 .” (Emphasis added) 210 F. 2d at 421 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"A conviction cannot be had on the extrajudicial confession of the defendant, unless corroborated by proof aliunde of the corpus delicti. Full, direct, and positive evidence, however, of the corpus delicti is not indispensable. A confession will be sufficient if there be such extrinsic corroborative circumstances, as will, when taken in connection with the confession, establish the prisoner's guilt in the minds of the jury beyond a reasonable doubt."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Shook
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.