Babb v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

210 F.2d 473 · 1954

Citation profile

cited by 10 later decisions

states following

May 1976

most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1976

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2316 · 18 U.S.C. § 2317 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 545

Relies on Isaacs v. United States · United States v. Kushner · Guyton v. United States · Shore v. United States · Arnold v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“‘ ‘ The motion for continuance in this case was materially lacking in many essential features; it did not allege specifically or substantially what Tom E. Grubb would testify to if present, and consequently it did not appear that if present his testimony would be material. Moreover, there was no assurance that he-would testify at all if present as, being a defendant, he could not. legally be compelled to testify. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. State v. Digiallonardo
““A motion for continuance is directed to the discretion of the trial court, and the court did not abuse its discretion in this case. Isaacs v. United States, 159 U.S. 487 , 16 S. Ct. 51 , 40 L.Ed. 229 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Ray v. United States

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.