Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 F.2d 559 - National Labor Relations Board v. Volney Felt Mills, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board v. Volney Felt Mills, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

210 F.2d 559 · 1954

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2000

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

80195419601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 141 (§ 1 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on United States v. Wunderlich · United States v. Moorman · National Labor Relations Board v. Standard Transformer Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rulings of the Regional Director were not arbitrary or capricious since they were based upon reasonable grounds, including family relationship of challenged voters to supervisory employees, one of such supervisory employees being the general superintendent of the respondent, and it is to be noted that unless there was infirmity in each of the challenges the union would still have prevailed and a mistake of honest judgment does not constitute an arbitrary or capricious decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Fraud will not lightly be inferred and in the absence of such gross mistakes as would necessarily imply bad faith or a failure to exercise an honest judgment, [an agreement] may not be set aside . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.