Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 F.2d 615 - Stevenot v. Norberg

Stevenot v. Norberg’s Empirical Analysis

210 F.2d 615 · 1954

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
August 1984
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 1984 · most notably Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co. (1963), Lundgren v. Freeman (1962)

40 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

1901954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 501

Relies on Walling US v. Helmerich & Payne · Reynolds v. Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum · Murphy v. Nowak · Bach v. Friden Calculating Mach. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a finding is essentially one dealing with the effect of certain transactions or events, rather than a finding which resolves disputed facts, an appellate court is not bound by the rule [footnote omitted] that findings shall not be set aside, unless clearly erroneous, but is free to draw its own conclusions.” [Footnote omitted]”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.